Lizard inference engineering: Two native providers should remain explicit
-
Inference Engineering · Day 18 · Morning
A provider selector is meaningless if the runtime silently launches a different engine.
Lizard carries the requested provider through server launch, health checks, benchmark artifacts, onboarding activation, and Chat telemetry. A mismatch is treated as an error rather than a successful run under the wrong label.
Provider identity belongs in both execution and evidence.
Can you prove which engine served the last response in your local stack?
Engineering fact: Lizard exposes lizard-native and Caterpillar as separate runtime providers in serve, onboarding, benchmark, and Chat paths instead of silently substituting one for the other.
#Caterpillar #LizardLLM #GPUProgramming #LocalAI #GGUF
<!-- lizard-marketing-slot:day-18-am -->
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login